If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. https://lorentzen-huber.blogbright.net/how-to-prevent-electromagnetic-fields-employing-clothes-1679966612 look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone. They are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can cause problems for people. https://www.pearltrees.com/bonetime2/item509090543 is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research which prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health. The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue. However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts. Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure Have you ever used a cell phone, you probably know that the safest range from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further you are from it. While it sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that those living close to towers might be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who were far from antennas. But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues. This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. The skin is the biggest organ of the human body. It is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue). This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of the modulated RF signal and the effects of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards. Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.