Study of Chinese Learners' Pedagogical Choices in Korean CLKs' awareness and ability to draw on relational affordances as well as learning-internal factors, were significant For instance, RIs from TS and ZL both mentioned their relationships with their local professors as a significant factor in their pragmatic choice to avoid expressing criticism of an uncompromising professor see the second example This article reviews all locally published pragmatic research on Korean up to 2020 It focuses on practical fundamental topics like Discourse Construction Tests DCTs The discourse completion test DCT is an instrument that is widely used in pragmatic research It has many advantages, but also some disadvantages The DCT is one example It is unable to account for cultural and individual variations Furthermore https//click4rcom/posts/g/17877590/how-to-create-successful-pragmatic-slot-buff-tutorials-from-home is also the case that the DCT is prone to bias and could result in overgeneralizations As a result, it must be carefully analyzed before using it for research or for assessment purposes Despite its limitations, the DCT can be a useful instrument to study the relationship between prosody, information structure and non-native speakers The ability of the DCT in two or more stages to influence social variables related to politeness could be a benefit This feature can help researchers understand the role of prosody in communication across different cultural contexts, a major challenge in cross-cultural pragmatics In the field of linguistics DCT is one of the most useful tools for analyzing communication behaviors of learners It can be used to examine a variety of issues that include politeness, turn taking, and lexical choice It can be used to assess phonological complexity in learners' speech Recent research utilized an DCT as a tool to assess the ability to resist of EFL students Participants were given a set of scenarios to choose from and then asked to select the appropriate response The authors found the DCT to be more effective than other refusal methods like a questionnaire or video recordings However, the researchers cautioned that the DCT should be employed with caution and include other methods for collecting data DCTs are usually designed with specific linguistic criteria in mind, such as content and form These criteria are based on intuition and is based on the assumptions made by the test creators They are not always precise and could misrepresent the way ELF learners respond to requests in real-world interactions This issue requires further studies of different methods to assess the ability to refuse A recent study has compared DCT responses to requests submitted by students via email versus the responses gathered from an oral DCT The results showed that the DCT promoted more direct and conventionally indirect request forms, and a lesser use of hints than the email data did Metapragmatic Questionnaires MQs This study looked at Chinese learners making pragmatic choices when using Korean It employed a variety of experimental tools including Discourse Completion Tasks, metapragmatic questions, and Refusal Interviews Participants were 46 CLKs of upper-intermediate who participated in MQs, DCTs and RIs They were also asked to reflect on their evaluation and refusal performance in RIs The results showed that CLKs often chose to reject native Korean pragmatism norms Their choices were influenced primarily by four factors that included their personalities and multilingual identities, their ongoing life histories and their relationships These findings have implications for pedagogy for L2 Korean assessment and teaching First, the MQ data were examined to identify the participants' rational choices The data were classified according to Ishihara's 2010 definition of pragmatic resistance Then, the choices were compared to their linguistic performance on the DCTs to determine whether they were a reflection of pragmatic resistance or not The interviewees were asked to explain their decision to use pragmatic language in a given scenario The findings of the MQs and DCTs were then analysed using descriptive statistics and z-tests It was found that the CLKs often resorted to euphemistic responses such as "sorry" and "thank you" This is likely due to their lack of familiarity with the target language which resulted in an inadequate knowledge of korea pragmatic norms The results showed that the CLKs' preferences for either converging to L1 or dissociating from both L1 and L2 pragmatic norms differed based on the DCT situations For example, in Situation 3 and 12 the CLKs favored to diverge from both L1 as well as L2 pragmatic norms whereas in Situation 14, they favored converging to L1 norms The RIs also revealed that CLKs were aware of their own pragmatism in each DCT situation The RIs were conducted one-to-one basis within a period of two days of participants completing the MQs The RIs were recorded and transcribing, and then coded by two coders who were independent The coders worked in an iterative manner and involved the coders reading and discussing each transcript The results of the coding process were evaluated against the original RI transcripts, which provided an indication of how well the RIs were able to capture the fundamental behavior Refusal Interviews RIs The key question in pragmatic research is why do some learners refuse to accept native-speaker norms Recent research has attempted to answer this question with a variety of experimental tools including DCTs MQs and RIs Participants comprised 46 CLKs and 44 CNSs from five Korean Universities Participants were asked to complete the DCTs and MQs in their L1 or their L2 They were then invited to an RI where they were asked to reflect and discuss their responses to each DCT situation The results showed that CLKs on average, did not conform to the pragmatic norms of native speakers in more than 40 of their responses They did so even though they could produce native-like patterns They were also aware of their pragmatic resistance They attributed their choice to learner-internal factors such as their personality and multilingual identities They also referred to external factors, such as relationships and advantages They outlined, for instance, how their relations with their professors enabled them to function more easily in terms of the cultural and linguistic standards of their university However, the interviewees also expressed concerns about the social pressures and punishments they could be subjected to if they strayed from their social norms They were worried that their native friends might view them as "foreigners” and think they were ignorant This concern was similar to the concerns voiced by Brown 2013 and Ishihara 2009 These results suggest that native speakers' pragmatic norms are not the norm for Korean learners They may still be useful for official Korean proficiency testing But it is advisable for future researchers to reconsider their usefulness in particular situations and in various cultural contexts This will allow them to better understand the impact of different cultural contexts on the classroom behavior and interactions of L2 students Moreover this will allow educators to develop more effective methodologies to teach and test the korea-based pragmatics Seukhoon Paul Choi is principal advisor for Stratways Group, a geopolitical risk consultancy based out of Seoul Case Studies The case study method is a method that focuses on intensive, participant-centered research to study a specific subject This method uses multiple data sources like documents, interviews, and observations to confirm its findings This kind of research is ideal for studying complicated or unique subjects that are difficult to quantify with other methods The first step in the case study is to define the subject matter and the purpose of the study This will allow you to determine which aspects of the subject matter are crucial for investigation and which ones can be omitted It is also helpful to read the literature to gain a better knowledge of the subject and put the issue in a larger theoretical context This case study was built on an open-source platform called the KMMLU Leaderboard [50], as well as its benchmarks for Koreans, HyperCLOVA X and LDCC Solar figure 1 below The results of this experiment showed that L2 Korean learners were highly susceptible to the influence of native models They were more likely to pick incorrect answer choices which were literal interpretations This was a deviation from a precise pragmatic inference They also exhibited an inclination to include their own text, or "garbage," to their responses, further reducing the quality of their responses Furthermore, https//shafferpontoppilivejournalcom/profile of this study were L2 Korean learners who had reached level 4 in the Test of Proficiency in Korean TOPIK at the end of their second or third year at university, and were aiming to reach level 6 on their next attempt They were questioned about their WTC/SPCC, pragmatic awareness, understanding and perception of the world The interviewees were presented two situations, each involving an imagined interaction with their interactants and were asked to select one of the following strategies when making a request They were then asked to explain the reasoning behind their choice The majority of participants attributed their pragmatist opposition to their personalities For instance, TS claimed that she was hard to get close to, and therefore refused to ask about her interactant's well-being with a heavy workload, even though she believed that native Koreans would do so