https//thabetcenter/ regarding parlays is DON'T Parlays generally carry an increased house edge than straight bets, which means you give the book a bigger advantage over you once you play them That, by itself, is reason enough to suppress the misplaced feelings of greed combined with fear that often lead to betting parlays People think they're risking less with parlays, but they aren't They believe they can win more with parlays, but they cannot The bigger win with parlays is far outweighed by the higher possibility of losing Parlay bettors are in fact risking more, with less possibility of collecting A parlay is not an individual bet It is two bets -- a one-unit bet using one team and a two-unit bet on the other Which team gets the two-unit bet In point-spread betting at constant money odds, if both teams win or both teams lose no matter which team gets the double bet When one team wins and something team loses, however, the double bet is presumed to have been on the loser How smart is that for the bettor Go ahead, create a parlay We'll wait until both games are over, and in case there is a split we'll put the double bet on the loser If your bookmaker sold you a parlay with that line, just how many of you'll still make the bet A parlay is also bad money management In a parlay you either bet double on the next team, or nothing on that same team, depending upon if the first game won or lost That adds some luck to your betting that doesn't have to be there The skilled handicapper is definitely seeking to make smart investments He tries to get rid of the result of luck to the best extent possible to make his results as predictable as possible Much like every rule, however, you can find exceptions The exception to the rule regarding parlays occurs when the two bets are co-dependent I knew one bookmaker who was taken for tens of thousands because he didn't understand the co-dependency of certain bets He allowed a player to consistently parlay the first half with the game The player parlayed totals by combining the over in the first half with the over in the overall game, and the under in the initial half with under in the game Both parlays were manufactured in the same game Every time the player won he'd win 26 times his bet Betting 100 on each parlay, if one of them won, the ball player would win 260 and lose 100 on the other parlay for a net win of 160 He could never win both parlays If he lost both parlays he would lose 200 Initially, this were a great opportunity for the book The standard coin-flip probability of winning one parlay out of the two are 50-50 So far as the bookie was concerned the bettor ought to be winning 160 half the time, and losing 200 half enough time The bettor, however, making 500 parlays, was ahead a lot more than 20,000 after 6 months, and the book begun to look at what the bettor was doing more carefully The problem for the bookmaker was that the two halves of every parlay were co-dependent By the end of the first half, the bettor was almost never in a 50-50 situation Take the Thursday night game between Utah and Air Force The game total was 53 and the first half total was 27 By the end of the first half, the score was 31-21, for a total of 52 first-half points The initial half of one of many parlays, the "over" in the initial half was a winner For the parlay probability to be correct, there should now be considered a 50-50 probability of winning the "over" for the game Obviously the odds of winning the "over" in the game weren't 50-50 but better than 99 and only the "over" The ball player only had a need to win the first 1 / 2 of the parlay to be virtually assured that he would collect 26 times his money rather than just 10 for 11 Before you rush out to use this, remember that most off-shore books are much too smart to let you parlay first half to game If they do enable you to do this, start worrying about collecting because that book will be taken to the cleaners There are, however, some less obvious co-dependent parlays that may still be made at many books One kind of co-dependent parlay may be the parlay of the medial side and total in exactly the same game Any game in which the total is significantly less than double the spread can give you an advantage in parlaying side to total in exactly the same game We've already discussed, in a prior article, how exactly to use these anomalous side and total combinations to hedge one another and boost your win with very little increase in risk This type of bet, however, needed that you have an impression privately or the total Parlaying is another solution to boost your potential win on these games, or to develop a potential win when you have no opinion You can find two games this Saturday that qualify They're Virigina -25 over Duke with a complete of 48 �, and Kansas St -24 � vs North Texas with a total 46 � In the Virginia game, if you believe that Virginia covers the 25 points, they must hold Duke to no more than 11 points or the overall game will go over the full total The more likely it becomes through the game that Virginia will cover 25 points, the much more likely it becomes that the overall game will review 48 � The wider Virginia's winning margin, the much more likely the game will go over If you want Virginia to cover the spread, and you also believe that Duke will not be shut out, in that case your probability of winning a parlay on Virginia and the over are higher than the normal 25 Likewise, if the scoring stays low, it really is less likely that Virginia covers the 25 points Subsequently, the probability that a parlay of the under with the underdog will win is greater than the normal 25 Assuming you have no opinion on the game, you can parlay the favorite with the "over" and the underdog with the "under" and collect sufficiently often to exceed the losses when both parlays lose In the only real other game meeting the qualifications this week -- Friday's game between California -30 against New Mexico State with a complete of 58 -- the under has already won with the underdog for a winning two-parlay spread The closer the posted total is to the spread on the side, the better win-rate will be on the parlay "spread" bet The co-dependency in side to total parlays isn't as strong as parlaying first half and game totals if it were, most books would not allow such bets, but there is a sufficient co-dependency in the games with low totals and high spreads to help make the strategy profitable long-term Not all bookmakers will help you to parlay the side to the total in exactly the same game, because more and more are realizing these bets are sometimes co-dependent But, enough books still do allow such bets so that you can consider including such bets in your professional betting arsenal If your bookmaker provides "if/reverse" bets, you can replace the parlay bet having an "if/reverse" bet and achieve greater success