The general rule regarding parlays is DON'T Parlays generally carry a higher house edge than straight bets, therefore you give the book a more impressive advantage over you when you play them That, by itself, is reason enough to suppress the misplaced feelings of greed coupled with fear that often result in betting parlays People think they're risking less with parlays, however they aren't They believe they can win more with parlays, however they cannot The higher win with parlays is far outweighed by the higher possibility of losing Parlay bettors are in fact risking more, with less probability of collecting A parlay is not an individual bet It really is two bets -- a one-unit bet using one team and a two-unit bet on the other Which team gets the two-unit bet In point-spread betting at constant money odds, if both teams win or both teams lose no matter which team gets the double bet When one team wins and one team loses, however, the double bet is presumed to possess been on the loser How smart is that for the bettor Just do it, create a parlay We'll wait until both games are over, and in case there is a split we'll put the double bet on the loser If your bookmaker sold you a parlay with that line, just how many of you would still make the bet A parlay can be bad money management In a parlay you either bet double on the next team, or nothing on that same team, depending upon whether the first game won or lost That adds an element of luck to your betting it doesn't must be there The skilled handicapper is definitely wanting to make smart investments He tries to eliminate the result of luck to the best extent possible in order to make his results as predictable as you possibly can Much like every rule, however, there are exceptions The exception to the rule regarding parlays occurs when the two bets are co-dependent I knew one bookmaker who was taken for thousands because he didn't understand the co-dependency of certain bets He allowed a player to consistently parlay the first half with the game The ball player parlayed totals by combining the over in the first half with the over in the overall game, and the under in the initial half with under in the overall game Both parlays were manufactured in the same game Each time the player won he'd win 26 times his bet Betting 100 on each parlay, if one of them won, the player would win 260 and lose 100 on the other parlay for a net win of 160 He could never win both parlays If he lost both parlays he would lose 200 At first glance, this were a great opportunity for the book The standard coin-flip probability of winning one parlay from the two are 50-50 So far as the bookie was concerned the bettor ought to be winning 160 half enough time, and losing 200 half the time The bettor, however, making 500 parlays, was ahead a lot more than 20,000 after six months, and the book started to look at what the bettor was doing more carefully The issue for the bookmaker was that the two halves of each parlay were co-dependent By the end of the initial half, the bettor was almost never in a 50-50 situation Take the Thursday night game between Utah and Air Force The overall game total was 53 and the first half total was 27 By the end of the first half, the score was 31-21, for a complete of 52 first-half points The initial half of one of many parlays, the "over" in the first half was successful For the parlay probability to be correct, there should now be a 50-50 possibility of winning the "over" for the game Obviously the chances of winning the "over" in the game weren't 50-50 but much better than 99 and only the "over" The ball player only had a need to win the first half of the parlay to be virtually assured that he would collect 26 times his money rather than just 10 for 11 Before you rush out to use this, be aware that most off-shore books are much too smart to enable you to parlay first half to game Should they do let you do this, start fretting about collecting because that book will be taken up to the cleaners You can find, however, some less obvious co-dependent parlays that can still be made at many books One type of co-dependent parlay is the parlay of the side and total in the same game Any game in which the total is less than double the spread can give you an edge in parlaying side to total in the same game We've already discussed, in a prior article, how to use these anomalous side and total combinations to hedge each other and increase your win with hardly any increase in risk Such a bet, however, required that you have an impression on the side or the total Parlaying is another solution to increase your potential win on these games, or to create a potential win in case you have no opinion You can find two games this Saturday that qualify They are Virigina -25 over Duke with a complete of 48 �, and Kansas St -24 � vs North Texas with a complete 46 � In the Virginia game, if you were to think that Virginia will cover the 25 points, they must hold Duke to only 11 points or the overall game will go over the total The more likely it becomes through the game that Virginia covers 25 points, the more likely it becomes that the overall game will go over 48 � The wider Virginia's winning margin, the more likely the game will review If you like Virginia to cover the spread, and you believe that Duke will never be shut out, in that case your possibility of winning a parlay on Virginia and the over are greater than the normal 25 Likewise, if the scoring stays low, it really is not as likely that Virginia will cover the 25 points Because of this, the probability that a parlay of the under with the underdog will win is greater than the normal 25 In case you have no opinion on the game, you can parlay the favorite with the "over" and the underdog with the "under" and collect sufficiently often to exceed the losses when both parlays lose In https//sv288app/ meeting the qualifications this week -- Friday's game between California -30 against New Mexico State with a total of 58 -- the under has recently won with the underdog for a winning two-parlay spread The closer the posted total would be to the spread privately, the better win-rate will be on the parlay "spread" bet The co-dependency in side to total parlays isn't as strong as parlaying first half and game totals if it were, most books would not allow such bets, but you will find a sufficient co-dependency in the games with low totals and high spreads to make the strategy profitable long-term Not all bookmakers will allow you to parlay the medial side to the full total in the same game, because an increasing number of are realizing these bets are sometimes co-dependent But, enough books still do allow such bets that you consider including such bets in your professional betting arsenal If your bookmaker provides "if/reverse" bets, it is possible to replace the parlay bet having an "if/reverse" bet and achieve greater success